 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
posted by Ruby Arngna'naaq on December 09, 1999 at 17:33:08:
in reply to: On Love and the Website posted by Jack Butler on October 31, 1999 at 15:33:01:
particiant Jack: I hadn't thought so much could be read into what I initially wrote but here I am 2 or 3 months later doing what you said you did, ajck: I carried around your comments/responses for some time and attempted at one point to respond but then "life has a tendacy to interrupte the best of intentions so here I am. Anyway, I was just attempting to point out the fact that there is no such thing as 'pure scientific' measurement. As far as I know and from listening to otheres there is always an element of humanness within any research done, by base reason for research, belief/prejudice, a certain type of understanding and compilation of data - no real such thing as "objective research". For example, as far as medical doctors and health care proffessional understand mile is one of the best things to bring people stay/back to health - well, in the case of Inuit most Inuit are lactose intolrant - so maybe milk is not always the best thing to drink. I am also, the way in which I expressed myself on love - I honestly believe taht love is measurable to quoate Jesus christ: "There is no greater love than that one give one's life for the other." Unlike another observer, I thoroughly enjoyed artworks hrough this technology and really quite appreciative taht it is available enabling me to participate. Maybe though the respondent was thinking that there is a certain lack of the artist's presence and voice... Meanwhile jack how are you, where are you? Where is Tom? In other words will I hear soon how another project is doing? Did you go to Baker? Follow Ups: post a Follow Up: |